Effect of plant growth stages on nutritional composition of promising Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) genotypes

Authors

  • S. A. Kharage Department of Biochemistry, PGI, Mahatma Phule Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Rahuri-413 722, Maharashtra, India.
  • S. V. Damame AICRP on Forage Crops, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri-413 722, Maharashtra, India.
  • P. K. Lokhande Department of Biochemistry, PGI, Mahatma Phule Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Rahuri-413 722, Maharashtra, India.

Keywords:

Dry matter, Fodder, Growth stages, Lucerne, Nutritional composition

Abstract

Nutritional composition of ten promising forage Lucerne genotypes was evaluated at pre-flowering, 50 per cent and post-flowering plant growth stages for dry matter, moisture, crude protein, cell wall constituents, in vitro dry matter and in vitro protein digestibility. Dry matter content at post-flowering stage was highest (23.27%) followed by 50 per cent (18.63%) and pre-flowering (16.91%) stages, respectively. Highest mean crude protein content was recorded at pre-flowering stage, followed by 50 per cent and post-flowering stages and the corresponding values were 20.82, 19.81 and 18.06 %, respectively. In vitro dry matter digestibility at pre-flowering stage was maximum (66.83%) followed by 50 per cent flowering with (64.76%) and post-flowering (60.78%) stages. In vitro protein digestibility at 50 per cent flowering stage was also maximum (85.97%) followed by the post-flowering (82.61%) and pre-flowering (80.11%) stages. Amongst the cuttings of forage lucerne genotypes at different plant growth stages, the cell wall constituents, viz., neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre, hemi-cellulose and acid detergent lignin were the lowest at pre-flowering stage and thereafter increased continuously with the advancement of growth stage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

20-11-2021

Issue

Section

Articles
Dimensions Badge

How to Cite

Effect of plant growth stages on nutritional composition of promising Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) genotypes. (2021). Range Management and Agroforestry, 35(1), 38-42. https://www.rmaj.in/rma/article/view/406

Similar Articles

1-10 of 495

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.